Framework

Build for Signal, Not Assumption

When training models for human behavior, go in with as few assumptions as possible. Let the data surface the features. Your intuitions about what matters are often wrong.

How it works

  1. 1The temptation is to say 'squinting eyes mean X' or 'flat voice tone means Y' before you have the data to back it up. Starting from assumptions bakes bias in from the beginning.
  2. 2Videra's approach: collect voice, video, and language features broadly, run structured clinical screeners alongside them, and let the model find which features actually predict the outcome.
  3. 3Then apply the sniff test: does it make sense that this feature is predictive? And does it hold across demographic groups?
  4. 4The bias version of this failure is Amazon's hiring model — trained only on high-performing men, it learned to predict that men perform better. The data was wrong because the training set was wrong.
  5. 5One critical behavioral predictor Videra found: whether a substance use patient sleeps at night predicts treatment completion and sobriety at 12 months better than almost any other signal. Nobody assumed that. The data surfaced it.

Hear it on the podcast

The Behavioral Health Crisis Is a Data ProblemListen to the episode

More from this episode

Get the next framework first

One email a week with the frameworks, tools, and founder stories from the podcast. Free.

More frameworks for AI & Automation