Definition
Collaborative Results Index (CRI)
Geoff Gibbins' framework for measuring the quality of human-AI collaboration across three dimensions: (1) results — the actual impact of the collaboration, not just activity or usage; (2) relationship quality — how well humans engage with AI as a collaborator, including critical thinking, good question formation, and not passively accepting first outputs; (3) resilience — whether the human is developing domain expertise through the collaboration or outsourcing judgment and atrophying. Most enterprise AI measurement stops at usage metrics; the CRI measures whether collaboration is making people genuinely better.
From the episode “Just Use AI Is the Most Dangerous Advice in Tech”Hear it on the podcast1 episode
Learn the language of AI-native founders
Every week: the new terms, tools, and workflows founders are using, straight from the podcast.
Related terms in Growth, Sales & Marketing
Client Avatar MismatchThe churn cause that occurs when a customer signs up with incorrect expectations about what the product delivers. At Stone Systems: contractors who believe $297 buys direct lead generation (spend → get leads) rather than a software platform that builds online presence and operational efficiency. Mismatched expectations are set before the sale and corrected only through better marketing copy, cleaner positioning, and sales qualification — not through product changes.ClientelingOne-on-one relationship selling where associates use customer data to drive personalized outreach and repeat purchases.Co-hosting / Collaborative EventsThe practice of partnering with other brands or individuals to share guest lists, split costs, and reduce hosting anxiety. The list share is often the primary value.Cohort retentionWhat percentage of users who joined in a given period are still active later. The QR code app held 20% at year five, which is exceptional.CollectionA curated subset of files indexed for AI interrogation.Competitive intelligence reportStructured analysis of your market position against named competitors, including adjacent entrants you aren't currently watching.Consumption PricingA pricing model in which customers pay based on actual usage rather than seats or licenses. Forces the vendor to care about adoption velocity and ongoing engagement — because revenue scales with real usage, not contract value. When Knapsack moved to consumption pricing, time-to-value became the primary commercial driver: the faster a customer gets value, the faster they consume more, the faster revenue grows. Aligns vendor and customer incentives in a way seat-based pricing does not.Content derivativesThe many formats, short video, long post, thread, spun from one core idea.