Framework

Two-Barrier Framework for Alternative Investments

CJ Follini's diagnosis of why individual investors stay out of alternative assets despite their superior risk-adjusted returns: two structural barriers — due diligence complexity and illiquidity. Both are planning problems, not knowledge problems. Neither can be solved without first building 2–3 years of personal budgeting history that reveals true investible cash, liquidity timeline, and risk tolerance.

How it works

  1. 1Due diligence barrier: evaluating individual deals or funds is hard — CJ spent 10 years learning to do it well; bad diligence means unquantified decision risk
  2. 2Illiquidity barrier: forced early exit from alternative investments can result in 70–80% haircuts — timing capital needs is the hardest part of alternatives
  3. 3Both barriers are rooted in planning deficits, not investment knowledge deficits — solve budgeting first
  4. 4You should not allocate to illiquid assets until you have 2–3 years of detailed budgeting history
  5. 5AI portfolio tools (Profit AI, Quarterback AI) can only add value after the budgeting foundation is established
  6. 6The sequence: financial literacy → budgeting discipline → portfolio optimization → alternative investment access

Hear it on the podcast

Millennials Will Inherit TrillionsListen to the episode

More from this episode

Get the next framework first

One email a week with the frameworks, tools, and founder stories from the podcast. Free.

More frameworks for Fundraising & Money

Outcome-Aligned Revenue ModelAxenya's approach to incentive alignment: charge a performance fee on the measurable delta between a client's healthcare cost growth and the market baseline. No outcome, no fee — making the vendor's financial interest structurally identical to the client's health interest.The Private Market Exchange Fund ModelExchange illiquid single-company shares for a diversified LP interest in a pooled fund - tax-free. The compounding of deferred taxes generates approximately 2x the after-tax wealth over seven years compared to a taxable sale and reinvestment. For a decade-long startup journey, the difference between a tax event at year five and no tax event can define the outcome.The 38% Series C Survival RateOf every US company that completed a Series C between 2010 and 2015, only 38% had produced value for employee shareholders a decade later. Yet investing in all of them would have generated over 5x returns. Concentration in a single company exposes you to the 62% failure scenario. Diversification across the cohort captures the portfolio return.The Private Market Liquidity GapThe private secondary market turns over approximately 3-4% of its $4 trillion asset base annually. Public small-cap indices turn over 100% per year. The gap between actual and potential liquidity is not a reflection of supply constraints - it reflects how early the infrastructure build is. Greg's frame: if the market matures toward public market norms, the growth ahead dwarfs everything that has happened so far.The Three-Bucket Expense ModelSeparate every business expense into Fixed (operating costs), Variable (sales-related costs), and Advertising (fuel). Treating advertising as a lever — not overhead — gives founders real-time control over the one expense category they can actually dial up or down.The Profit Foundation First FrameworkSet how much you should be spending on fixed and variable costs before touching advertising. ROAS is a vanity metric without knowing your true cost structure — high ROAS can coexist with losing money every month.